1. What major change in constitutional law did the Supreme Court make in Mapp v. Ohio? What three justifications did Justice Clark offer for the result that the Court reached in that case? Explain. 2. What would have been the practical legal and policy consequences for the United States in the late 1940s had Justice Black persuaded one more justice to join his opinion in Adamson v. California? 3. What position does Justice White advance in his concurring opinion in Katz v. United States? Is it consistent with his view of the Fourth Amendment that we find in his opinion in Chimel v. California? How? Explain. 4.In Duncan v. Louisiana (1968), the majority opinion of Justice White, the concurring opinion of Justice Black, and the dissenting opinion of Justice Harlan represent three distinct methodologies for deciding which provisions of the Bill of Rights are to be applied to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment. Identify and explain these three methodologies. Each question has to be a minimum of 200 words. 1-4
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. You may also use reputable outside sources. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Source text book: Mason, A. T., & Stephenson, D. G. (2012). American constitutional law: Introductory essays and selected cases (16th ed.). Boston, MA: Longman.